Fata Morgana (chimerically) wrote,
Fata Morgana


On my way to class yesterday I heard just the beginning of an NPR discussion on adding happiness as a new economic indicator. The speaker noted that while the "quality of life," as it is defined economically, has increased twofold in the last fifty years, people are no more happy with all their stuff than they were without it. Given my prior research and continuing interest in the development and use of indicators (both traditional and alternative), naturally I was intrigued.

Indicators in general have had mixed success. Their "facts at a glance" nature that makes them so popular is also their downfall, especially when they are used independent of their context. Many politicians thing more about changing the number than understanding the implications of the number and changing the conditions. Also, once indicators are established, they generally remain in place, unquestioned, even when they no longer measure something useful. The notorious "Gross National Product" (now "Gross Domestic Product"), a throwaway indicator developed in the Great Depression, has remained the salient international economic indicator even though it does not actually reflect the quality of life, individual wealth, and a number of other things people think it means.

  • bee harvest

    So, as some of you know, I keep bees. Why I would interact, willingly and on a regular basis, with thousands of venomous insects may baffle you - it…

  • cat-sitting + Stanislaw Lem = awesomeness.

    cat-sitting + Stanislaw Lem = awesomeness. Originally uploaded by morganya

  • blinded with (solar panel) science!

    Our solar panel system has been running for about a year and a quarter now. One awesome thing about using Enphase microinverters (other than the fact…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded